Rewilding vs Housing: the Josaphatsite
Most people in Brussels are aware of the Josaphatpark, a green and open
space to relax, meet up with friends, exercise, etc. located in Schaarbeek. However,
not many are aware that just a 100m north from the park an almost equally large
open green space is located. This other ignored open green space is the
Josaphat site. From 1926 to 1994, this site was used as a freight station and
had 6 different rails of which just 3 remain today. It was privately owned by
the NMBS/SCNB and bought by the regional administration of Brussels in 2005. In
2013 most of the remaining station rails were removed, and filled in with a
clean slate of grit. After this, the terrain has been left barren and was at
the center of different debates on what to do with the site. Meanwhile, the
site was left alone and began to rewild.
The Josaphatsite 1953; still a
freight station (Bruciel)
When leaving a barren ground untouched it can begin the process often referred
to as ‘rewilding’. Rewilding is when humans step aside and let nature go its
own course. Nature will restore itself, enabling growth in biodiversity. To
this day, this phenomenon can be seen in action at the Josaphatsite. As this
site has been a subject of many debates, many studies and analyses have been
made. One common point that stands out in many of these studies is the
increasingly important biodiversity of the place.
As of April 2023, there have been 1406 animal and plant species observed
within the site. To give an idea: 248 species of bees and and ants, 35 species
of dragonfly, 138 species of birds, etc. (waarnemingen.be). Some of the
observed species are very rare for Belgium. These numbers illustrate a truly impressive
result, especially for an area in urban context. This also goes to show how
effective the rewilding can and has been at restoring the site’s biodiversity.
A green and biodiverse space
(Bral, 01/03/2023)
Besides being a green open space, it’s also seen as an opportunity for
housing construction.
Around 50.000 families are registered on a waiting list for social
housing in the Brussels-Capital region. One of the solutions to the housing
problem was to plan for expansion zones in advance (about 10 years ago). 10
expansion zones were selected, among them the Josaphatsite. Originally planned
to build 1400 housing units and other service buildings. Authorities had
planned on providing a social mix, access to public transport (Evere station),
office buildings for SMEs and other services. From a social and economic
perspective this wasn’t a bad plan. But this was planned out before any studies
or site analyses had been done. Around mid 2019 the Brussels-Capital region
tasked a new environmental study. As we now know, this has become an important
sanctuary for the urban ecosystem of the Brussels region. Yet in April of 2020,
without any warnings, in the middle of breeding season, in came excavators to
dig 1000 square meters of valuable habitat (mainly to dragonflies, some of
which are very rare). No permit was needed because it was only preparatory work
for a large-scale soil test.
Vision for the Josaphat site
(MSI, 08/2022)
There’s also a lot of controversy around the process of planning. The
Brussels-Capital region makes use of a tool called ‘Plan d’Aménagement
Directeur’ ( PAD ). This tool allows them to ignore previously set regulations
on a site (like building height limit, etc.), making it easier for them to
develop and implement new master plans. This also allows them to minimize
citizen consultation and participation. The current project also has a lot of
controversy, one being that they stated that only 40-45% of the housing will be
publicly owned. Many people believe that this isn’t enough considering a
waiting list of 50.000 families.
Since first being announced, the plans have constantly been changed. In
recent times the plan has evolved a lot from the original concept. Some
important changes such as the amount of publicly owned buildings which has been
raised to 50%, meaning an equal amount of publicly as privately-owned housing
units. And although the PAD gave the authorities a lot of free range, they
still had to abide by the environmental effect reports (MER). Previous MER plan
had been made for the 2019 plans for the site, but with a newly adjusted plan
winter 2020, the MER plans also needed to be revised (winter 2020-2021). This
report gives a prediction of the effects of the planned project on the
environment. It also compares the old and the new plan for positive or negative
changes. In the end the plans will have to change to the MER report if deemed
necessary to protect the environment.
In the end, the Brussels-Capital region isn’t doing anything legally
wrong; they probably didn’t even need a PAD. On the ‘Gewestelijke
bestemmingsplan’ the site is located in an area that says: "This area is
intended for housing, facilities of collective interest or of public services,
production activities, offices and green spaces that preserve the existing
biological qualities of the species”. And while on the one hand the argument of
the rich and important biodiversity can be made against construction, on the
other hand one could argument that there is a drastic need for (social)housing
and agree with the construction. The current plan theoretically looks to
be in balance of both sides, 50/50 housing and green, but this will probably
mean a major loss of biodiversity (more than 50%). Still no construction has
begun to this day and debates are still going on. The site remains at the center
of an ongoing political controversy.
Authors:
Ian Van Den Noortgaete & Emmanuel Fransman
References:
David Van Reybroeck. (2020). Sauvons la friche Josaphat. Brussels and
“Rewilding”.
https://www.sauvonslafrichejosaphat.be/bruxelles-et-le-rewilding-d-van-reybroeck/
Josaphat.brussels. https://josaphat.brussels/en/news
Perspective.brussels. (2021). https://perspective.brussels/nl/stadsprojecten/strategische-polen/josaphat
Steyn Van Assche. (2021). Bral action brussels. Het Manifesto van
PlanBJosaphat is er!
https://bral.brussels/nl/artikel/het-manifesto-van-planbjosaphat-er
No comments:
Post a Comment